|
MagnetOnlyMotors (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@sabriath O.K. Thanks.
Donovan.
sabriath (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
@MagnetOnlyMotors : I was just roaming around the internet, trying to find interesting things....off to something else....good luck with that
MagnetOnlyMotors (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
sabriath, Actually, a copper pipe will not do the same thing. If you are bored why are you here?
Donovan.
sabriath (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It looks like you used a pretty good conductive metal as the so-called "shielding" which lowers the field across the metal equalizing it quickly. A copper pipe will do the same trick. Real proof would be to use 1 magnet instead of 4, and placing it perpendicular to the axis of the pipe. I'll check out your other videos though, I'm bored.
MagnetOnlyMotors (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Rotitomato, Good question, answer, not very much. Pretty hard to calibrate bare handed. My internal dynamos were disabled that day. Sorry.(p.s. you don't have to completely extract the shield for it to function).
Donovan.
Rotitomato (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
It's a good demo, the question is how much energy does it take to remove the shield from the magnet?
MagnetOnlyMotors (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
mailtosrini5, Hi Amara. Thank you for the nice comment & I'll see what I can do about your suggestion with copper & aluminum.Frankly, I don't think it will behave the same, but time will tell.
Donovan.
mailtosrini5 (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
hi,
This is very good demo for magnetic field variance when shielded with iron pipe.
Since you already have iron fillings. Would you please demo on magnetic field variance with copper and aluminum shielding.
Thanks,
Amara.
MagnetOnlyMotors (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
shivrajvishnu, Thank you.
Donovan.
shivrajvishnu (November 30, 1999 at 12:00 am)
Awesome |
